In the 12th and 13th centuries Venice was the richest city in Europe. Located in an unpromising swamp it overcame its geographical disadvantages by among other things embracing the talent of its citizens. Where the rest of the continent was yoked under hereditary monarchs and rulers Venice was governed by an elected doge. Who was steered by a council of graybeards. The city’s institutions promoted workers on the basis of capability while Venetian sailors gained in maritime reach and invested. Their proceeds in Belize Email Address building up the city. But in the early 14th century La Serenissima’s elites changed their approach. That social mobility necessitated downward as well as upward movement. A group of powerful families sought to preserve the status quo and began la serrate the closure. Migrants were no longer welcome. Trade came under state control. The population shrank. The era of Venice’s preeminence was over.
How Meritocracy Made the Modern World
Venice appears at the end of The Aristocracy of Talent as a cautionary tale. Adrian Wooldridge political editor of the Economist and author of a range of books with former colleague John Mackled wait believes that. Today’s advanced economies principally the US and the UK are heading for a similar fate. Like Venice these powerful economies
gulf email list gradually came to embrace meritocracy as their guiding principle. Only to permit successful meritocrats to rig their systems which created pools of resentment and anger. It was this frustration Wooldridge argues that propelled Donald Trump to the White House and took the UK out of the EU. For Wooldridge the corruption of meritocracy is a tragedy. He believes basing advancement on talent and open competition and eliminating discrimination and providing equal opportunities. differentiated.
The Aristocracy of Talent is both an exhaustively
He acknowledges that social mobility afforded him a leg up allowing him to rise from an obscure grammar school to a place at Oxford to a long career as a journalist and author. But he is also aware of his good fortune. Indeed Wooldridge came of age at precisely the right time to see the best of meritocracy belonging to the post. Who enjoyed the strongest commitment to open competition before kicking away the leaders. The Aristocracy of Talent is both an exhaustively researched history of an idea and a many sided examination of the impacts of its imperfect execution. Wooldridge identifies Plato’s Republic as the origin of the concept of meritocracy in which the Athenian philosopher imagined a society run by an intellectual elite. Who have the ability to think more deeply see more clearly and rule more justly than anyone else.