That makes it an accessible and insightful read for anyone Burundi Email List who believes there’s no Planet B. here fore must help the poor survive it. We owe them that much he says. A decade ago advocates touted the sharing economy as an alternative to corporate capitalism. Digital technology opening vast new peer peer marketplaces .TaskRabbit and Airbnb found in 2008 Uber in 2009 RelayRides now Turro in 2010 Postdates in 2011 Lyft in 2012. These platforms promised that people would be able to make a good living while working. They wanted selling their time and skills and renting out. Their cars spare bedrooms that dusty camping gear in the attic. Over art for Juliet B. Schor’s After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back.
But digital technologies have a customer through uncertainty
You will know by now that things haven’t turned out exactly as expected Juliet Schor gulf email list wryly notes. In her new book After the Gig. Schor a sociology professor at Boston College. Her team at the Connected Consumption project funded by the MacArthur Foundation. The studied gig workers and platforms of the sharing economy from 2011 to 2017. The result is a more nuanced view than offered by previous books on this topic. Which typically focus on either build their own platforms or how platform companies prosper by evading regulation and exploiting workers. The less you actually need a gig job the more likely it is that a gig job will work for you.
That phrase comes from through uncertainty
“Workers’ experiences are not uniform, with variation in pay rates, job satisfaction, and how they do the work,” Schor explains. “As we saw these differences playing out at individual companies, we realized that they are explained by how dependent the worker is on income from the platform to pay basic living expense’s. Schor’s team found that supplemental workers that is, workers who are not financially dependent on their platforms make more money, have more autonomy, and are more satisfied with their gigs than platform-dependent workers. Moreover, the former group comprises 34 percent of the workers in the sample the team studied; the latter was only 22.5 percent. The rest, nearly half of platform workers, fall between the two extremes.